build 5b42cca3 | content blog-content@c8490fa · 338 posts | profiles 20 · corpus 267 | 0 skipped | | format
apiVersion: soultec.ch/v1kind: Solutionmetadata: name: vmware/vsphere-foundation locale: en labels: vendor: VMware vSphere Foundation capability/virtualization: 1.37 capability/cloud: 1.94 vendor/vmware: 0.88 annotations: source: src/content/solutions/en/vmware/vsphere-foundation.md route: /en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation/ schema: /nerd/schema/solutions.json markdown: /en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation.mdspec: title: vSphere Foundation tags: [virtualization, cloud] vendors: [vmware] summary: >- The smaller of the two Broadcom bundles: vSphere with operations tooling, without the full private cloud platform on top. photoNeed: >- A vSphere or VCF console on a real screen at soulTec: a cluster view, a running task, an inventory tree, so the reader should recognise the UI stub: false draft: false kind: platform acronym: VVF addon: false vendorName: VMware vSphere Foundation status: current practice: >- Draft, not yet reviewed. The question that opens almost every conversation here is not “VVF or VCF”. It is “how many cores does Broadcom actually count for us”. The answer decides the architecture more often than any technical requirement does. practiceReview: true sections: - heading:

What it is

body: | vSphere Foundation, or VVF, is the smaller of the two Broadcom bundles. It carries vSphere, a defined allowance of vSAN and the operations tooling, but not the full platform with NSX and automated lifecycle management. - heading:

What it is for

body: | Estates that want to run virtualization properly and are not building a private cloud. That is most of them. If you already run vSphere with vCenter and need neither network virtualization nor self-service for development teams, this is the right cut. The path to VCF stays open, and it is a licensing change rather than a rebuild. - heading:

What to watch

body: | The line between VVF and VCF does not sit where the technology would put it. It sits where Broadcom drew it, and it has moved several times since the acquisition. Check the current position before you build a multi-year plan on it.status: corpus: 267 services: - {ref: services/cloud, score: 0.51} - {ref: services/virtualization-container, score: 0.47} - {ref: services/orchestration-automation, score: 0.46} - {ref: services/engineering, score: 0.40} posts: - {ref: posts/vcf-full-stack-ab-oktober-2027-mythos-oder-wahrheit, score: 1.00} - {ref: posts/ms-secure-boot-cert-expiry-2026, score: 1.00} - {ref: posts/how-to-vlr-9-0-4-bugfix, score: 1.00} - {ref: posts/how-to-fix-nsx-to-re-import-esx-into-vcf, score: 1.00} - {ref: posts/how-to-get-online-depot-working-in-vcf-9, score: 1.00} - {ref: posts/dsm-9-0-mssql-support, score: 1.00} experts: - {ref: experts/karl-widmer, score: 0.67} - {ref: experts/aldo-gwerder, score: 0.60} - {ref: experts/daniel-stadelmann, score: 0.60} neighbours: - {ref: solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation, score: 0.75} - {ref: solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation/vcf-automation, score: 0.75} - {ref: solutions/hpe/hpe-private-cloud-business-edition-pcbe, score: 0.70}
{ "apiVersion": "soultec.ch/v1", "kind": "Solution", "metadata": { "name": "vmware/vsphere-foundation", "locale": "en", "labels": { "vendor": "VMware vSphere Foundation", "capability/virtualization": "1.37", "capability/cloud": "1.94", "vendor/vmware": "0.88" }, "annotations": { "source": "src/content/solutions/en/vmware/vsphere-foundation.md", "route": "/en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation/", "schema": "/nerd/schema/solutions.json", "markdown": "/en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation.md" } }, "spec": { "title": "vSphere Foundation", "tags": [ "virtualization", "cloud" ], "vendors": [ "vmware" ], "summary": "The smaller of the two Broadcom bundles: vSphere with operations tooling, without the full private cloud platform on top.", "photoNeed": "A vSphere or VCF console on a real screen at soulTec: a cluster view, a running task, an inventory tree, so the reader should recognise the UI", "stub": false, "draft": false, "kind": "platform", "acronym": "VVF", "addon": false, "vendorName": "VMware vSphere Foundation", "status": "current", "practice": "Draft, not yet reviewed. The question that opens almost every conversation here is not “VVF or VCF”. It is “how many cores does Broadcom actually count for us”. The answer decides the architecture more often than any technical requirement does.\n", "practiceReview": true }, "sections": [ { "heading": "

What it is

",
"body": "vSphere Foundation, or VVF, is the smaller of the two Broadcom bundles. It carries\nvSphere, a defined allowance of vSAN and the operations tooling, but not the full\nplatform with NSX and automated lifecycle management." }, { "heading": "

What it is for

",
"body": "Estates that want to run virtualization properly and are not building a private cloud.\nThat is most of them.\n\nIf you already run vSphere with vCenter and need neither network virtualization nor\nself-service for development teams, this is the right cut. The path to VCF stays open,\nand it is a licensing change rather than a rebuild." }, { "heading": "

What to watch

",
"body": "The line between VVF and VCF does not sit where the technology would put it. It sits\nwhere Broadcom drew it, and it has moved several times since the acquisition. Check the\ncurrent position before you build a multi-year plan on it." } ], "status": { "corpus": 267, "services": [ { "ref": "services/cloud", "score": "0.51" }, { "ref": "services/virtualization-container", "score": "0.47" }, { "ref": "services/orchestration-automation", "score": "0.46" }, { "ref": "services/engineering", "score": "0.40" } ], "posts": [ { "ref": "posts/vcf-full-stack-ab-oktober-2027-mythos-oder-wahrheit", "score": "1.00" }, { "ref": "posts/ms-secure-boot-cert-expiry-2026", "score": "1.00" }, { "ref": "posts/how-to-vlr-9-0-4-bugfix", "score": "1.00" }, { "ref": "posts/how-to-fix-nsx-to-re-import-esx-into-vcf", "score": "1.00" }, { "ref": "posts/how-to-get-online-depot-working-in-vcf-9", "score": "1.00" }, { "ref": "posts/dsm-9-0-mssql-support", "score": "1.00" } ], "experts": [ { "ref": "experts/karl-widmer", "score": "0.67" }, { "ref": "experts/aldo-gwerder", "score": "0.60" }, { "ref": "experts/daniel-stadelmann", "score": "0.60" } ], "neighbours": [ { "ref": "solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation", "score": "0.75" }, { "ref": "solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation/vcf-automation", "score": "0.75" }, { "ref": "solutions/hpe/hpe-private-cloud-business-edition-pcbe", "score": "0.70" } ] }}
apiVersion = "soultec.ch/v1"kind = "Solution"[metadata]name = "vmware/vsphere-foundation"locale = "en"[metadata.labels]vendor = "VMware vSphere Foundation""capability/virtualization" = "1.37""capability/cloud" = "1.94""vendor/vmware" = "0.88"[metadata.annotations]source = "src/content/solutions/en/vmware/vsphere-foundation.md"route = "/en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation/"schema = "/nerd/schema/solutions.json"markdown = "/en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation.md"[spec]title = "vSphere Foundation"tags = ["virtualization", "cloud"]vendors = ["vmware"]summary = "The smaller of the two Broadcom bundles: vSphere with operations tooling, without the full private cloud platform on top."photoNeed = "A vSphere or VCF console on a real screen at soulTec: a cluster view, a running task, an inventory tree, so the reader should recognise the UI"stub = falsedraft = falsekind = "platform"acronym = "VVF"addon = falsevendorName = "VMware vSphere Foundation"status = "current"practice = '''Draft, not yet reviewed. The question that opens almost every conversation here is not “VVF or VCF”. It is “how many cores does Broadcom actually count for us”. The answer decides the architecture more often than any technical requirement does.'''practiceReview = true[[sections]]heading = "

What it is

"
body = '''vSphere Foundation, or VVF, is the smaller of the two Broadcom bundles. It carriesvSphere, a defined allowance of vSAN and the operations tooling, but not the fullplatform with NSX and automated lifecycle management.'''[[sections]]heading = "

What it is for

"
body = '''Estates that want to run virtualization properly and are not building a private cloud.That is most of them.If you already run vSphere with vCenter and need neither network virtualization norself-service for development teams, this is the right cut. The path to VCF stays open,and it is a licensing change rather than a rebuild.'''[[sections]]heading = "

What to watch

"
body = '''The line between VVF and VCF does not sit where the technology would put it. It sitswhere Broadcom drew it, and it has moved several times since the acquisition. Check thecurrent position before you build a multi-year plan on it.'''[status]corpus = 267[[status.services]]ref = "services/cloud"score = "0.51"[[status.services]]ref = "services/virtualization-container"score = "0.47"[[status.services]]ref = "services/orchestration-automation"score = "0.46"[[status.services]]ref = "services/engineering"score = "0.40"[[status.posts]]ref = "posts/vcf-full-stack-ab-oktober-2027-mythos-oder-wahrheit"score = "1.00"[[status.posts]]ref = "posts/ms-secure-boot-cert-expiry-2026"score = "1.00"[[status.posts]]ref = "posts/how-to-vlr-9-0-4-bugfix"score = "1.00"[[status.posts]]ref = "posts/how-to-fix-nsx-to-re-import-esx-into-vcf"score = "1.00"[[status.posts]]ref = "posts/how-to-get-online-depot-working-in-vcf-9"score = "1.00"[[status.posts]]ref = "posts/dsm-9-0-mssql-support"score = "1.00"[[status.experts]]ref = "experts/karl-widmer"score = "0.67"[[status.experts]]ref = "experts/aldo-gwerder"score = "0.60"[[status.experts]]ref = "experts/daniel-stadelmann"score = "0.60"[[status.neighbours]]ref = "solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation"score = "0.75"[[status.neighbours]]ref = "solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation/vcf-automation"score = "0.75"[[status.neighbours]]ref = "solutions/hpe/hpe-private-cloud-business-edition-pcbe"score = "0.70"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><manifest kind="Solution"> <apiVersion>soultec.ch/v1</apiVersion> <metadata> <name>vmware/vsphere-foundation</name> <locale>en</locale> <labels> <vendor>VMware vSphere Foundation</vendor> <entry key="capability/virtualization">1.37</entry> <entry key="capability/cloud">1.94</entry> <entry key="vendor/vmware">0.88</entry> </labels> <annotations> <source>src/content/solutions/en/vmware/vsphere-foundation.md</source> <route>/en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation/</route> <schema>/nerd/schema/solutions.json</schema> <markdown>/en/solutions/vmware/vsphere-foundation.md</markdown> </annotations> </metadata> <spec> <title>vSphere Foundation</title> <tags> <item>virtualization</item> <item>cloud</item> </tags> <vendors> <item>vmware</item> </vendors> <summary>The smaller of the two Broadcom bundles: vSphere with operations tooling, without the full private cloud platform on top.</summary> <photoNeed>A vSphere or VCF console on a real screen at soulTec: a cluster view, a running task, an inventory tree, so the reader should recognise the UI</photoNeed> <stub>false</stub> <draft>false</draft> <kind>platform</kind> <acronym>VVF</acronym> <addon>false</addon> <vendorName>VMware vSphere Foundation</vendorName> <status>current</status> <practice>Draft, not yet reviewed. The question that opens almost every conversation here is not “VVF or VCF”. It is “how many cores does Broadcom actually count for us”. The answer decides the architecture more often than any technical requirement does. </practice> <practiceReview>true</practiceReview> </spec> <sections> <section> <heading>

What it is

</heading>
<body>vSphere Foundation, or VVF, is the smaller of the two Broadcom bundles. It carriesvSphere, a defined allowance of vSAN and the operations tooling, but not the fullplatform with NSX and automated lifecycle management. </body> </section> <section> <heading>

What it is for

</heading>
<body>Estates that want to run virtualization properly and are not building a private cloud.That is most of them.If you already run vSphere with vCenter and need neither network virtualization norself-service for development teams, this is the right cut. The path to VCF stays open,and it is a licensing change rather than a rebuild. </body> </section> <section> <heading>

What to watch

</heading>
<body>The line between VVF and VCF does not sit where the technology would put it. It sitswhere Broadcom drew it, and it has moved several times since the acquisition. Check thecurrent position before you build a multi-year plan on it. </body> </section> </sections> <status> <corpus>267</corpus> <services> <item> <ref>services/cloud</ref> <score>0.51</score> </item> <item> <ref>services/virtualization-container</ref> <score>0.47</score> </item> <item> <ref>services/orchestration-automation</ref> <score>0.46</score> </item> <item> <ref>services/engineering</ref> <score>0.40</score> </item> </services> <posts> <item> <ref>posts/vcf-full-stack-ab-oktober-2027-mythos-oder-wahrheit</ref> <score>1.00</score> </item> <item> <ref>posts/ms-secure-boot-cert-expiry-2026</ref> <score>1.00</score> </item> <item> <ref>posts/how-to-vlr-9-0-4-bugfix</ref> <score>1.00</score> </item> <item> <ref>posts/how-to-fix-nsx-to-re-import-esx-into-vcf</ref> <score>1.00</score> </item> <item> <ref>posts/how-to-get-online-depot-working-in-vcf-9</ref> <score>1.00</score> </item> <item> <ref>posts/dsm-9-0-mssql-support</ref> <score>1.00</score> </item> </posts> <experts> <item> <ref>experts/karl-widmer</ref> <score>0.67</score> </item> <item> <ref>experts/aldo-gwerder</ref> <score>0.60</score> </item> <item> <ref>experts/daniel-stadelmann</ref> <score>0.60</score> </item> </experts> <neighbours> <item> <ref>solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation</ref> <score>0.75</score> </item> <item> <ref>solutions/vmware/vmware-cloud-foundation/vcf-automation</ref> <score>0.75</score> </item> <item> <ref>solutions/hpe/hpe-private-cloud-business-edition-pcbe</ref> <score>0.70</score> </item> </neighbours> </status></manifest>
Solution · VMware

vSphere Foundation VVF

The vendor calls it: VMware vSphere Foundation

The smaller of the two Broadcom bundles: vSphere with operations tooling, without the full private cloud platform on top.

VMware Pinnacle Partner

Topics Virtualization 1.37 Cloud 1.94
Vendors VMware 0.88
04Services
06Posts
02Capabilities
267Corpus

What it is

vSphere Foundation, or VVF, is the smaller of the two Broadcom bundles. It carries vSphere, a defined allowance of vSAN and the operations tooling, but not the full platform with NSX and automated lifecycle management.

What it is for

Estates that want to run virtualization properly and are not building a private cloud. That is most of them.

If you already run vSphere with vCenter and need neither network virtualization nor self-service for development teams, this is the right cut. The path to VCF stays open, and it is a licensing change rather than a rebuild.

What to watch

The line between VVF and VCF does not sit where the technology would put it. It sits where Broadcom drew it, and it has moved several times since the acquisition. Check the current position before you build a multi-year plan on it.

What we do with it

Draft, unreviewed

Draft, not yet reviewed. The question that opens almost every conversation here is not “VVF or VCF”. It is “how many cores does Broadcom actually count for us”. The answer decides the architecture more often than any technical requirement does.

This paragraph is a draft and nobody at soulTec has confirmed it yet. Everything above it describes the product and is checkable against the vendor.

Posts about it

Who works with it

Do you work with this? Take a look at our open roles.